January’s “Virtual Vaccine Town Halls”

For the rest of this month, every Democrat and Republican state legislator will be hosting a series of “Virtual Vaccine Town Halls,” at which Health Secretary Rachel Levine will be on hand to answer questions.

PLEASE SEARCH YOUR OWN REPRESENTATIVE’S AND SENATOR’S WEBSITE OR FACEBOOK PAGE TO FIND OUT WHEN THOSE MEETINGS ARE.

And sign up and attend those meetings.

There appear to be many different days and times to accommodate different work schedules, so hopefully you can attend one.

As far as we know, it is not necessary to attend “your own” legislator’s virtual town hall; you can attend whichever fits your schedule.

You should come prepared to ask valid questions about vaccine safety issues, serious ethical problems with vaccine policy, and especially the lack of accountability when (not if, WHEN) something goes wrong.

You should NOT launch personal criticism or insults at legislators. Doing so is destructive to your own reputation, and to that of any movement to which you appear to belong.

You should NEVER EVER EVER launch personal criticism or insults (including references to gender or gender identity) on Dr. Levine (or anyone else). Doing so will not only destroy your own reputation, but is so destructive to any group associated with you, we will assume that anyone doing so is deliberately attempting to harm the informed choice movement.

We understand how angry and frustrated everyone is. Keep the goals in sight: we want people to understand the problems with POLICY. Personal criticism and insults are a distraction from that issue. It’s also something we expect from middle schoolers, not from reasonable, intelligent adults.
** We will not be taken seriously if we launch personal attacks on vaccine proponents, health officials, P/VP (current or future), or legislators. PERIOD. Publicly expressing your personal feelings about Mr. and Mrs. Gates, about Dr. Levine, Biden/Harris, about Trump, or ANY public figure will automatically reflect badly on YOU, and therefore on the health freedom movement.

Personally, I couldn’t care less if the Secretary of Health were a Martian, a giraffe, or the Tin Man from Oz, as long as I agree with their efforts — and if I don’t, you can be sure I’m going to talk ONLY about why I disagree with their efforts, NOT about their looks, their origins, their phylum, genus, or their metal/corrosion level.

You may think whatever you like, but please refrain from the Mean Girl gossip, insults, and complaints. You can’t afford the fallout, and neither can we.

** We will not be taken seriously if we make claims that are simply not true, or even claims that are almost correct.

So do not claim that thimerosal and/or aluminum in MMR causes autism (MMR never contained either), or that acellular pertussis vaccine creates asymptomatic carriers (anybody exposed to the actual live virus, vaccinated or not, can be an asymptomatic carrier), or that vaccines cause more harm than good (impossible to prove without making massive assumptions, and it’s a distraction anyway, because we don’t NEED to prove that vaccines harm >51% when harming even 1% is unacceptable collateral damage).

Do NOT claim that vaccines don’t prevent disease, because it’s already been proven that they do; what HASN’T been proven is the marketing mantra that such protection is lifelong.

We also need to avoid claiming that the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines will genetically modify us, change our DNA, contain computer chips, or cause trans-humanism.

What we CAN do is present verifiable concerns:

Health officials do NOT know in advance who is susceptible to serious reactions to COVID-19 vaccines, and as far as we know, they are not taking steps to find out. While most people who have serious anaphylactic reactions do have a history of allergic reaction, NOT ALL DO.

Health officials are ignoring the possibility that COVID-19 may provoke autoimmune issues that could take months to become symptomatically apparent — and as far as we know, there is no safe way to turn off either the vaccine-induced spike protein manufacture, or any autoimmune issue that might result.

We can express our concern that a one-size-fits-all chemical treatment is being urged on a population-wide basis.
And we can certainly remind everyone of Articles 3 and 6 of the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: Article 3 – Human dignity and human rights
1. Human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms are to be fully respected.
2. The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.
Article 6 – Consent
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.

3. In appropriate cases of research carried out on a group of persons or a community, additional agreement of the legal representatives of the group or community concerned may be sought. In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.

Here are just a few of the zoom meetings:

Interestingly, UNESCO has chosen this time to do “maintenance” on their website, so we will put a link to an archived version in the comments. Please copy/paste and keep handy.